Banning Lead For Outdoor Sporting

MENU
 

HOME

LEAD TACKLE AND SHOT

ALTERNATIVES TO LEAD TACKLE AND SHOT
LEGISLATION

GET INVOLVED!

REFERENCES



 
 

Loon

 

Alternatives to Lead Tackle and Shot

 

Alternative Tackle Materials and Cost

There are alternative tackle materials (see Figure 1) available that can make lead sinkers obsolete.  Brass and zinc can now be used and are less toxic than lead (VFW, 2004).  It is not yet known how poisonous brass and zinc are but it is understood that large quantities may present a problem.  Tin, bismuth, and steel are regarded as being environmentally friendly and their use is recommended by the Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife (VFW, 2004).  

Figure 1.  Comparison of Lead and Alternatives (Kapsch 1999).

Material

Relative Toxicity to Waterfowl

North American Availability

Lead High Excellent
Steel Low Good
Bismuth/Tin Low Moderate
Tungsten/Bismuth/Tin Low N/A
Zinc Moderate N/A
Molybdenum/Polymer Moderate N/A
Tungsten/Polymer Low N/A

 

The banning of lead sinkers and jigs will not come without a cost.  The economic impact due to the banning of lead sinkers would be nominal to the average angler.  The average angler spends $1.50 - $3.50 annually on sinkers.  Non-toxic sinkers could increase that cost by up to $4.00 (USEPA 1994)The prices discovered at two online fishing stores suggests that this increase could be quite lower (see Figure 2)    (Cabelas and Bass Pro Shops, 2004).  

The lead industry is very large and could be impacted with a ban on lead fishing weights.  The largest impacted business's will be the small 'mom and pop' tackle makers.  However, I believe there is a solution to this problem.  The answer may be to not completely ban lead sinkers, initially, but to allow business's to expand its line of materials and eventually phase lead out of production.  The option of mass-producing alternative, environmentally friendly weights will hopefully drive the cost down and help these suppliers stay in business. 

Figure 2.  Price Comparison's of Toxic and Non-Toxic Fishing Tackle                  (Cabelas and Bass Pro Shops, 2004).

Products Relative Toxicitiy to Waterfowl Number Cost
BassPro Lead Split Shot Toxic 210 $5.00
Cabela's Lead Shot Toxic 100 $3.00
XPS Diamond Drop Weights (lead) Toxic 10 $3.00
BassPro Tin Split Shot Non-Toxic 210 $5.50
Cabela's Non-Toxic Shot Non-Toxic 100 $4.25
Loon Outdoors Tungsten Putty Non-Toxic 1 oz. $6.00

 

Alternative Shot Materials and Cost

When the ban on lead shot for waterfowl hunting was put into place many hunters were opposed to switching to the alternative steel shot.  Many hunters believed that the steel would damage the barrels of their guns and that it would ultimately cripple more waterfowl  than with lead.  Although, a study conducted by M.R. Szymczak (1978) indicates that crippling rates were actually declining with the use of steel.  

With time, hunters and industry worked out the kinks and now lead-alternative shot is an accepted fact for hunting waterfowl, but is less accepted for upland hunting.  Today, steel is one of the most popular, and least expensive, alternative to lead shot (see Figure 3).  Bismuth and tungsten alloys bear the closest resemblance to lead and also provides the killing power of lead, especially at long distances (Cabela's 2004).   

Figure 3.  Price Comparison's of Toxic and Non-Toxic Game Ammunition          (Cabela's 2004).

Material Products Relative Toxicity to Waterfowl # of Shells Cost
Lead Cabela's Xtreme Lead

Toxic

25 $9.00
Steel

Federal Duck and Pheasant Steel

Cabela's Xtreme Steel

Non-Toxic

Non-Toxic

25

25

$8.00

$18.00

Non-Toxic Alloys Federal Premium Tungsten-Iron-Steel

Bismuth No-Tox

Non-Toxic

Non-Toxic

10

10

$12.00

$15.00

LINKS

BACK TO JSC STUDENT PAGES
MY RESUME
EMAIL ME


 Earth

Top of Page | Home